So if we are supposedly not in a position making abductive judgment calls at least on naturalism, then on what exactly are we in a position making abductive judgement calls?!?
Maybe we are simply not in a position making abductive judgment calls on any thing and everything - period.
If so, then this "self-defeater" not just defeats naturalism but also it defeats itself, since then we are not in a position making an abductive judgment call on "being in a position (or being not in a position) making abductive judgement calls".
Same goes for Plantinga's EAAN.
If naturalism is (supposedly) true and if according to naturalism cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable, then one can not reliably deduct with cognitvie faculties, that our cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable given naturalism, since cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable, if naturalism is supposedly true and according to which cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable.
Or in short Plantinga's "self-defeater" not just defeats naturalism but also it defeats itself.
To think, that naturalism is "self-defeating" in such a way and manner is already a "self-defeating" position to have.
So if we are supposedly not in a position making abductive judgment calls at least on naturalism, then on what exactly are we in a position making abductive judgement calls?!?
Maybe we are simply not in a position making abductive judgment calls on any thing and everything - period.
If so, then this "self-defeater" not just defeats naturalism but also it defeats itself, since then we are not in a position making an abductive judgment call on "being in a position (or being not in a position) making abductive judgement calls".
Same goes for Plantinga's EAAN.
If naturalism is (supposedly) true and if according to naturalism cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable, then one can not reliably deduct with cognitvie faculties, that our cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable given naturalism, since cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable, if naturalism is supposedly true and according to which cognitive faculties are supposedly not reliable.
Or in short Plantinga's "self-defeater" not just defeats naturalism but also it defeats itself.
To think, that naturalism is "self-defeating" in such a way and manner is already a "self-defeating" position to have.