‘Thus “creation science”—note the explicit appropriation of the word science here.. ..advanced the historically fictitious “conflict myth.’
But it was Darwinian Evolution that had misappropriated the word science.
Evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture.
To change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content. The three billion DNA ‘letters’ stored in each human cell nucleus convey a great deal more information than the over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism. None of the alleged proofs of Evolution provide a single example of functional new information being added to genes.
In undermining Genesis, Darwinian Evolution torpedoes biblical authority. The only thing left for many people is ‘religion’ — an empty, lifeless shell.
Quote:
‘Thus “creation science”—note the explicit appropriation of the word science here.. ..advanced the historically fictitious “conflict myth.’
But it was Darwinian Evolution that had misappropriated the word science.
Evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture.
To change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content. The three billion DNA ‘letters’ stored in each human cell nucleus convey a great deal more information than the over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism. None of the alleged proofs of Evolution provide a single example of functional new information being added to genes.
In undermining Genesis, Darwinian Evolution torpedoes biblical authority. The only thing left for many people is ‘religion’ — an empty, lifeless shell.